Which attack type exploits the second stage of the TCP three-way handshake by sending numerous SYN-ACK packets to exhaust server resources?

Which attack type exploits the second stage of the TCP three-way handshake by sending numerous SYN-ACK packets to exhaust server resources?

• A. Fragmentation Attack
• B. Multiple SYN-ACK Spoofed Session Flood Attack
• C. SYN Flood Attack
• D. SYN-ACK Flood Attack

Answer: (D)

The attack hinges on the TCP handshake stage where the server has already replied with a SYN-ACK and is waiting for the final ACK from the client. In a SYN-ACK flood, the attacker overwhelms the target by causing a large number of SYN-ACK responses to be sent, typically by using spoofed client addresses. Each SYN received by the server triggers state to be allocated for a half-open connection until the final ACK arrives. If many such SYN-ACKs are sent and no corresponding ACKs come, the server’s backlog or connection-tracking resources fill up, preventing legitimate clients from establishing new connections. This directly targets the second stage of the handshake—the server’s SYN-ACK—making it the best fit. The other options describe different ideas: a fragmentation attack exploits IP fragmentation, a standard SYN flood targets the initial SYN message, and a variant described as a spoofed session flood is less specific in how it phrases the second-stage flood.

The attack hinges on the TCP handshake stage where the server has already replied with a SYN-ACK and is waiting for the final ACK from the client. In a SYN-ACK flood, the attacker overwhelms the target by causing a large number of SYN-ACK responses to be sent, typically by using spoofed client addresses. Each SYN received by the server triggers state to be allocated for a half-open connection until the final ACK arrives. If many such SYN-ACKs are sent and no corresponding ACKs come, the server’s backlog or connection-tracking resources fill up, preventing legitimate clients from establishing new connections.

This directly targets the second stage of the handshake—the server’s SYN-ACK—making it the best fit. The other options describe different ideas: a fragmentation attack exploits IP fragmentation, a standard SYN flood targets the initial SYN message, and a variant described as a spoofed session flood is less specific in how it phrases the second-stage flood.